Table 2 |
||||||||||||||
|
Patient characteristics and outcomes |
||||||||||||||
|
Age, Sex |
Level |
Kemp Sign |
SLRT |
FNST |
Sensory Disturb |
Muscle Weakness |
disc protrusion CT discogram |
Preop conservative treatment |
disc protrusion op-finding |
Preop JOA score |
Postop JOA score |
Recovery Rate (%) |
different outcomes |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
1 |
88, F |
L5-S1 |
+ |
- |
- |
L5 |
- |
+ |
3 M |
+ |
3 |
11 |
30.8 |
Contralateral side* |
|
2 |
69, F |
L3-L4 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
L4 |
IP, QF, EHL |
+ |
5 M |
+ |
7 |
14 |
31.8 |
Contralateral side |
|
3 |
70, F |
L5-S1 |
+ |
- |
- |
L5 |
- |
- |
2 M |
- |
12 |
12 |
0 |
no pain relief |
|
4 |
80, F |
L5-S1 |
+ |
- |
- |
L5 |
EHL |
- |
2 M |
- |
12 |
19 |
41.2 |
Ipsilateral side† |
|
5 |
70, F |
L5-S1 |
+ |
+ |
- |
L5 |
EHL |
+ |
5 M |
+ |
11 |
20 |
50 |
|
|
6 |
56, M |
L4-L5 |
+ |
+ |
+ |
L4 |
- |
+ |
14 M |
+ |
15 |
29 |
100 |
|
|
7 |
76, F |
L3-L4 |
- |
- |
+ |
- |
- |
+ |
6 M |
+ |
14 |
28 |
93.3 |
Ipsilateral side |
|
8 |
75, F |
L5-S1 |
+ |
- |
- |
L5 |
EHL |
+ |
8 M |
+ |
5 |
20 |
62.5 |
|
|
9 |
67, M |
L5-S1 |
+ |
+ |
- |
L5 |
EHL |
+ |
9 M |
+ |
8 |
29 |
100 |
|
|
10 |
60, M |
L5-S1 |
+ |
+ |
- |
L5 |
EHL |
NA |
4 M |
+ |
11 |
27 |
88.9 |
|
|
11 |
68, M |
L5-S1 |
- |
- |
- |
L5 |
- |
+ |
5 M |
+ |
11 |
21 |
55.6 |
|
|
12 |
40, F |
L5-S1 |
- |
+ |
- |
L5, S1 |
- |
+ |
2 M |
+ |
14 |
19 |
33.3 |
|
|
13 |
78, M |
L5-S1 |
+ |
- |
- |
L5 |
EHL |
+ |
6 M |
+ |
11 |
16 |
27.8 |
|
|
14 |
66, M |
L5-S1 |
- |
+ |
- |
L5 |
EHL |
- |
4 M |
- |
20 |
28 |
88.9 |
Ipsilateral side |
|
15 |
63, F |
L3-L4 |
+ |
+ |
- |
L3 |
- |
NA |
7 M |
+ |
13 |
20 |
43.8 |
|
|
16 |
66, M |
L3-L4 |
+ |
- |
+ |
L3 |
IP, QF |
+ |
4 M |
+ |
13 |
20 |
43.8 |
|
|
17 |
62, F |
L4-L5 |
+ |
- |
+ |
- |
EHL |
NA |
18 M |
+ |
4 |
11 |
28 |
|
|
10.8 ± 4.3 |
20.2 ± 6.2 |
54.1 ± 30.0 |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
* contralateral side = later recurrence of the same symptom on the contralateral side of the surgery † ipsilateral side = later appearance of symptoms on the contralateral side of the surgery |
||||||||||||||
|
Doi et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2011 6:16 doi:10.1186/1749-799X-6-16 |
||||||||||||||
