Table 2 |
|||||
|
Comparing complications and implant survival of the published series of custom and modular proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement with the present series |
|||||
| Author |
Infection |
Local Recurrence |
Dislocation |
Revision |
5 Year Survival |
|
|
|||||
| Kabukckuoglu12 [custom] 54 patients [1972–1992] |
1.8% |
28% |
11% |
17% |
|
| Unwin4 [custom] 263 patients [1968–92] |
2.7%* |
4.6%* |
6.1% |
||
| Gosheger11 [modular] 41 patients [1992–03] |
19.5% |
7.3% |
78.7% |
||
| Menendez7 [modular] 96 patients [1992–03] |
6.3% |
3.1% |
10.4% |
7.3% |
82% |
| Present Series [modular] 100 patients [2001–07] |
6% |
4% |
3% |
3% |
83.1% |
|
* had revision surgery | |||||
Chandrasekar et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2008 3:50 doi:10.1186/1749-799X-3-50 |
|||||
